Saturday, February 26, 2005
On a totally different note, musing on the computer technology I am using these days:
I use the Microsoft XP operating system, and I have enough Microsoft compatible programs that I will probably stick with Microsoft operating systems for the forseeable future. But I am quickly becoming less dependent on Microsoft programs in general, not because of some anti-Microsoft prejudice, but because of frustrations with Microsoft products. Let me just name a few:
1. I used to use the M's Internet Explorer. But many parts of the program do not work anymore: opening pdf files, accessing secure sites, etc. And, to fix it, I would have to re-install the whole operating system, which is a major day long task, and it still might not work. So I switched to Mozilla's Firefox, and it works great, is easy to customize, and easy to re-install whenever you need to. It's also free. Because it is not a part of a giant, immensely complex system, it is easy to upgrade and use.
2. Same with M's Outlook & Outlook Express for e-mail. I had one at work and another at home, and I wanted one program at both places to handle email. I switched to Mozilla's Thunderbird. It works better, it's free, it's easy to upgrade or re-install. Again, it is not a part of a master system.
3. Same with M's Office suite. I like it, and I have two different versions, one at home and one at work. But for most tasks, I have switched to OpenOffice.org Again, it's free, it's easy to upgrade or re-install, and the version I have is newer than either M Office Suite I have. For a simple document writer like myself, it is also nice to use, because it does not have as many bells and whistles. And again, it is not integrated into some larger system.
4. Last year, I wanted a good calendar/planning/scheduling program, that was easy to use and back up. It seemed like a real hassle to use M's Outlook, and have to purchase two copies of it to have an up to date version at home and work. It was also not very flexible and customizable. What I really wanted was not something that integrated into a larger system or office suite, but a standalone, secure database scheduler that worked well. So, I went with Franklin-Covey PlanPlus for Windows (not free).
Anyway, it seems to me that Microsoft, with its 30,000 some employees and billions in cash, is so focused on making everything an 'integral part' of its system, that the individual pieces of the system suffer. It cannot seem to improve one part of the system quickly, especially if it is not something people are spending a lot on. This is especially true of its 'free' products, like I. Explorer or Outlook Express. What if they just focused on making their core product, their OS, secure and stable, and spun the rest off as independent entities?
Anyway, this is not a very theological post, but it is worth noting how well open-source movements and smaller, focused companies can compete with the Microsoft System. M's focus seems to be on keeping people dependent on their System, so that we connect to the world through It and are stuck with It. I, for one, don't think It's evil, but simply not flexible or customizable. With M, I feel out of control, because even the act of downloading and installing updates or upgrades is out of my hands - the System does it for me, just as the System checks to see that it is not a stolen System; it's kind of creepy. Maybe someday I'll go Linux!
Saturday, February 05, 2005
Greetings. I have not written anything for a long time. I will soon be up and writing again, but without a promised agenda for this blog. I am catching up on my journey through the Bible by listening in the car on tape (and online), but it was unrealistic to think I would journal about that regularly – too much else to do.
One thing about listening to the Bible is that every verse and every part of the Bible has equal weight. When I read the Bible on my own, I tend to focus in on the New Testament, or when I read the Old Testament, I focus on key stories, prophets, and Psalms. Listening forces me to hear it all – even the parts I'd rather skip or skim.
Just today I was listening to lengthy descriptions of ritual sacrifice in Exodus. Now, animal sacrifice is not a part of my religious faith or practice, but it is a part of the background, the pre-history, of the Christian faith and of all modern religions. When I preside at the Lord's Supper tomorrow, I am NOT sacrificing anything. Christ sacrificed himself once and for all on the cross; we do not reenact that sacrifice. Still, the OT background of sacrifice does illuminate or foreshadow the meaning of Christ's sacrifice, and it also raises the question for us today: What are we to sacrifice for God today? A sacrifice of the heart? A sacrifice of obedience? A sacrifice of faith?
As the season of Lent approaches, I am planning to write regularly. That will be my Lenten discipline this year. God be with you. Eric
Here is an update: a draft of my sermon for today, Transfiguration Sunday. Please give feedback